‘Star Wars,’ The Original Series (Part Ten): ‘Episode VI, Return of the Jedi’ — A Recapitulation and the Challenge Fulfilled – FINAL THOUGHTS

Rebel forces battle Imperial TIE fighters and TIE interceptors near the Death Star in ‘Return of the Jedi’

Rage Against the Empire’s Machine

Revelations of character relationships can be tricky to pull off. That Lucas and his crew were able to keep a lid on so much information about the protagonists is admirable in itself. Now that so many cats have been let out of the Imperial bag, what next? Why, back to the new and improved Death Star, of course. Where else?

For many fans, this “back to the past” movement ruined the continuity of what had been so carefully built up over time. Expectations had risen that things were about to take off in earnest (literally!) with the release of Star Wars: Episode VI — Return of the Jedi. At the movie’s midpoint, Vader sneaks his vessel onto the forest moon of Endor’s landing pad. As Lucas put it in his commentary, it’s time to settle accounts and concentrate on the battle between Vader and Luke Skywalker, the so-called “emotional core of the picture.”

Ben Burtt, the series’ sound FX engineer, expressed the difficulties inherent to trying to match voiceovers and dubs three years after the fact. Namely, with older-sounding actors, vis-à-vis the variable acoustic environments that separate the original edited voicework from their current redubs. Headaches, always headaches. Why not leave things as they were? Nah, too easy. Let’s make them harder for everybody.

Vader escorts the handcuffed Luke to face the pot-marked emperor. For his part, Luke tries to work those Jedi mind games into his dialogue with Papa Vader, a calmer and more subdued exchange than their last one. He reminds Vader of his former self by calling him by his given moniker, Anakin Skywalker. “That name no longer has any meaning for me,” Vader insists, pointing Luke’s own lightsaber into his son’s face. Be careful what you wish for, dad! Luke’s attempts at rekindling some feeling in the old boy fall flatter than the Tatooine landscape. Vader is too far gone in his twisted logic to be manipulated by one so young and so hopeful.   

Yet Vader acknowledges the truth of the matter: that Luke is indeed as powerful as the emperor has foreseen. That’s why Luke was brought to Endor in the first place, to bear witness to that time-tested changing of the old guard (Darth Vader) for the new (Master Luke). As he speaks, Vader physically has his back turned to Luke, a powerfully symbolic gesture indicating he’s far from ready to join his son in battle against a common foe. He reiterates that old Sith myth about the power of the dark side, yadda-yadda-yadda. That’s for certain. And it continues to exert a strong pull on its adherents. Too strong, in fact.

Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) with the Jedi’s green lightsaber in ‘Return of the Jedi

Producer-director Lucas exults in the knowledge that Luke refuses to comply with Vader’s command. He will not fight, he will not bend, nor will he join forces until the very end. All this, despite Vader’s insistence that Sonny Boy learn the “true nature of the Force” from that evil bogeyman, the equally twisted emperor. As Lucas pointed out, this is unlike the physically exhausting fight the two combatants had at the end of Empire Strikes Back. This encounter is more of an emotional conflict, a one-sided psychological ploy to influence the outcome through wordplay, not swordplay. Will this work? We shall see.

Let’s get back to the rebel forces. Lucas reiterated his belief that small fighting units could indeed make a difference, much as the Huns did against the Romans, or the colonists against the British in their struggle for independence. This is a not a new idea, he went on, but one that’s been around for centuries. Here, the thought that a mighty Galactic Empire might be brought down by those “cute little teddy bears” is what keeps that new hope alive.

We transition to the rebel fleet, about to jump into hyperspace to confront their foes. Just as quickly, we’re back on Endor with that small rebel detachment about to launch their concurrent “surprise assault” on the empire’s force field. This rapid jump-cutting, in itself, is “proof” of what modern cinematic techniques have accomplished through the intervening years. A physical manifestation of what a visionary George Lucas had implied in his director’s commentary (remembering that not Lucas, but Richard Marquand did the actual directing duties here).

In author Jonathan Rinzler’s The Making of Return of the Jedi, he points out that Lucas’ initial rough draft for the picture placed Princess Leia on Endor as the sole instigator of the rebellion. Along with the cuddly Ewoks were these gigantic aliens, the Yuzzum, whom Leia convinced to join forces with their tiny partners in a battle to the death. Luke was still on Tatooine, trying to rescue poor Han Solo, now unfrozen from the carbonite, in time before his execution.

In addition, the final confrontation between Luke, Vader, and the emperor occurs in a lava pit somewhere below the planet’s surface. It’s supposed to be a three-way duel of sorts, with the Evil Emperor and the Dark Lord having much more than a difference of opinion as to who has the upper hand in the Galactic realm. That’s not all: other surprises await, including unexpected appearances by Obi-Wan Kenobi and the late and much-lamented Yoda. How’s that for an encore!

Ah, well, none of this was meant to be. As rough drafts go, this one was lightyears ahead of Hollywood and ILM’s ability to carry out those rough ideas and bring them to fruition. They belong to the “What if” school of lost opportunities.

Meanwhile, Princess Leia hears from Threepio that one of the Ewoks is about to make an unwise move: he’s going to steal a speeder, and right from under the Imperial guards’ noses. “Not bad for a little furball,” mouths Han to Leia. This maneuver supplies the element of surprise needed for the rebel force to temporarily storm the generator shield.

Threepio, Princess Leia, Chewie, and Han Solo look on admiring at the Ewoks’ handiwork

Back on the Imperial Star cruiser, Vader leads Luke up the steps to meet his fate. The color red predominates. “Evil, the red devil,” claimed Lucas. “The bad guys,” in the book according to George, “exist in a black and white world. The good guys live in an organic world, which is either browns, light browns, tans, or greens.” Earth tones, in other words, warm and approachable. Whereas the bad guys reside in a world of absolutes, a mechanical world where views are cold and rigid. Indeed, they are!

The emperor greets Young Skywalker with his usual false courtesy. “In time, you will call me master,” he boasts, in that bullfrog’s voice of his. Ugh, he’s as much of a badass, if not worse than, that slimy old toad, the late Jabba the Hutt. Fascinating how the emperor’s makeshift throne gives the appearance, through spokes that make up the window frames behind him, of a spider’s web. So that’s it! The Evil Emperor is a big, black hungry bug hunter, “luring the flies into his web,” Lucas remarked. Added to which, he’s so full of himself, so sure in his ability to foresee events as they are about to unfold. However, prescience and advance knowledge, in our view, have made the old bloke overconfident.

The man in black gives notice to Luke that, one: his friends on Endor are walking into a trap; and two, so is the rebel fleet (to be reinforced by Admiral Akbar’s oft-quoted line, “It’s a trap!”). Never one to overlook the obvious, the emperor senses that Luke wants his lightsaber to strike down the old fogey before his plan works its magic. No sooner has the evil one spilled the beans on what’s about to happen when we transition back to where the rebel force enter the area guarded by the force field. They’re thwarted in their mission by Stormtroopers and other guards. Look quickly for Ben Burtt’s cameo, as he speaks the word “Freeze,” prior to getting a toolkit thrown at his noggin.

We’re just in time for the next memorable line: “You rebel scum!” Eew, don’t you hate it when they say that? To compensate, Burtt tells listeners about a young Kenyan man who spoke the words of one of the rebel co-pilots in his native tongue. They dubbed in the lines, which when the film was shown in Kenya, drew raves from an appreciative audience. Just in time, too, to enjoy the marvelous FX of incoming TIE fighters, flying in and out of formation, battling it out with those X-wings, all courtesy of blue screen, scale models, and computer-aided programming. Lucas confessed that, originally, there was to be only one Death Star and one giant battle involving not the Ewoks (a reworking of the name “Wookiee”) but the Wookiees themselves. Still, as we all know, the best laid plans can often go awry.   

Back on the Imperial star cruiser, the emperor goads Luke on into reacting to his repugnant sayings — daring him to strike him down “with all his hatred,” thus letting slip the angry dogs of war that will turn him to the dark side of life. Flash forward to the rebel base, where things do not look well for our friends. Nice feel of the Imperial Walkers lurking about, which segues directly to the amassed Ewok attack. Finally, somebody’s doing something to stop the bad guys from winning.

The repugnant Evil Emperor of the Galactic Empire (Ian McDiarmid)

Again, it’s a sheer joy to hear our furry friends sound the battle cry of freedom, a tune straight out of Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments (if you’re into useless trivia). Against the combined might of Imperial forces, the Ewoks hurl their bows and arrows at the oncoming hordes. If you’re thinking Robin Hood and His Merry Men, battling the Sheriff of Nottingham in Sherwood Forest, you’re right on the money. They even used the same type of feathers that give the arrows that “swish” sound.

Believability is the key, as the seesawing confrontation goes back and forth. The Ewoks are up, the Ewoks are down. True, they’re no match for the Galactic Empire’s high-tech might. Still, to cast the Ewoks as the disruptive element that distracts and saps the strength of a superior foe made audiences root for their success all the more. In this, Lucas and company did not disappoint.

We return to the emperor’s throne room. He’s still trying to get Luke to work up a head of steam, in order to blow his top off at Papa. Words, words, and more words. A torrent of lies — all aimed at poor Luke, the venom unleashed in slow, steady strokes. The anger begins to well up in our hero. You can practically hear audiences whispering under their collective breath: “Don’t give in, Luke!” Though he wants Luke to strike him down with all his might, the emperor knows that his ultimate aim is to get Luke to kill his father, then take dad’s place beside the emperor.

It’s the age-old “point of succession” theory: you don’t REALLY want that person to take your place, now, do you? You want him or her to THINK that’s what they’re doing. This same illogic will reoccur in Rian Johnson’s Star Wars: Episode VIII – The Last Jedi (2017), specifically in Rey’s make-or-break clash with Snoke, another pot-marked baddie. The truth is, you’re the next victim of the emperor’s whims. He’ll use and abuse you, until you’re spent and done. Then along comes another bright whippersnapper to take your place, and we’re back at it again. Wash, rinse, repeat.

It’s Siegfried turning on Grandpa Wotan/Wanderer and marrying Aunt Brünnhilde; it’s Oedipus slaying his father Laius to marry his mother Jocasta. And BINGO! You’ve got a whale of a Greek and Norse tragedy, if not a helluva tale. Well, if it’s Luke murdering his dada, then taking up with a monster who’s got no blood relation to him at all, then you’ve got yourself an unresolved conflict — and a winning formula guaranteed to earn boffo box office returns as well as the audience’s sympathy.

In the meantime, the tide of battle begins to turn when Chewie, our eight-foot Wookiee wonder, joins in the frolic by volunteering his fair share of service to the rebel cause. The Ewoks, those little Vietnamese counterparts, inflict enough damage on the opposition that it allows our friends, the sidelined Leia and still-clueless Han, to hold the advantage.

Example: A wounded Leia lies on the ground. As Imperial Stormtroopers approach, Han, who’s bent down to assist Her Highness, covers up the fact that she’s pulled a laser weapon on the troopers. “I love you,” Han whispers. “I know,” Leia answers back, reversing the same snappy give-and-take quips they hurled at each other toward the end of The Empire Strikes Back. A nice, full-circle loop to their classic Tracy and Hepburn routine, a love-hate relationship for the space age.

It’s Over and Done With (For Now)

We approach the crux of the drama, which to most fans involves the best sequence of all: that of Luke and Vader’s final battle. This fabulous match-up spills over into the very bowels of the craft (in another nod to Warner Brothers’ classic The Adventures of Robin Hood). A dip into Hell itself, but not the physical lava-filled landscape that will take place in the as-yet-to-have-been-filmed Episode Three: Revenge of the Sith. No, that’s yet to come. This is a Hell of the protagonists’ making, placed before them by the machinations of a thoroughly malevolent being.

The climactic duel of the lightsabers between Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker in ‘Return of the Jedi’

According to George Lucas, the emperor’s primary objective is to make Luke angry. Knowing that anger has the affect of turning the Jedi to the dark side, Luke employs reverse psychology in his banter with Vader. “Your thoughts betray you, Father. I feel the good in you, the conflict.” Vader replies smoothly: “There is no conflict.” But Luke does not budge. He presses on with the verbal onslaught, insisting he will not fight. To do so, will only lead Luke down the path to the dark side, a no-no in anybody’s book.

As the rebel forces seem to reverse their earlier losses, Vader seeks out Luke in the underbelly of the emperor’s throne room. We hear his slow and steady breathing, an ominous growl that telegraphs to audiences to beware the Big Bad Bear. If you poke him, he will respond. At this point, Vader tries a different tack, using Luke’s model of reverse logic but taking it to another realm entirely: that of the emotions. Vader senses Luke’s fondness for his friends, especially for one in particular: his sister Leia!

Instinct has informed the Dark Lord that sheer force of arms won’t turn his son into a Sith. This leaves him no choice: Vader must fight fire with fire. And, boy, does he unload the big one on our unsuspecting hero. “If you will not turn to the dark side… then perhaps she will.” That did it. Luke immediately goes into action mode: “Never!” he shouts, pointing his lightsaber directly at dear old dad.

Their duel to the death is the highlight of the series. And it’s here that this 1983 Star Wars entry finally approaches the grandeur it has so far lacked; where the clash of titans elevates the saga to the operatic, made all-the-more potent through John Williams’s use of underscoring and a wordless, mixed chorus of voices. The basic thrust of the action accompanying the “music” is the lightsaber duel that gives off plenty of sparks in themselves. They supply their own musical tones, along with appropriate CGI-effects. The dominant colors, then, are red and green: red (bad, evil), for the Sith; and green (good, virtuous), for the Jedi.     

The sequence climaxes with Luke’s hacking away at Vader’s weapon. Finally, the Dark Lord releases his lightsaber, perfectly timed to Luke’s slicing of his father’s right hand — the same right hand that Vader had sliced off in their earlier battle in The Empire Strikes Back. This brings out the gloating, bile-spilling emperor, wallowing in the carnage and exhorting Luke to fulfill his destiny by taking his father’s place at the old geezer’s side. Go on, dude, finish him off!

Not so fast! Luke takes a long, hard look at his black-gloved hand (appropriate, in this context) and compares it to what’s left of his father’s mechanical stump. “Never,” he finally responds, but in a much quieter, self-controlled mode than before. “I’ll never turn to the dark side.” Gasp, gulp! Luke finishes his speech by asserting his firm stance against further harm: “I am a Jedi, like my father before me.” And how does the emperor react? In typically villainous fashion: “So be it, Jedi,” spilled out with all the relish that are in the evil fiend’s capacity.

Having accomplished what they set out to do, producer Lucas, director Marquand, and co-screenwriter Lawrence Kasdan wrap up what’s left over, story-wise, in a purportedly tight little bow. For one, the shield generator is destroyed, which brings down the force field; and for another, the rebels resume their nonstop attack on Death Star II. Go get ’em, boys!

British director Richard Marquand (left, pointing) and George Lucas (in beard and glasses)

Okay, that’s one plot element out of the way. Now, what about Luke and the Evil Emperor? An interesting juxtaposition between two opposing forces, but do you really need to know the outcome? I mean, isn’t it obvious that Luke will prevail, or that Vader will do an about-face by picking up and tossing that vile emperor into the Death Star II’s nuclear reactor pit, or whatever you call it? We need not go into specifics. The only genuine thrill is the ultimate revelation of what’s behind the dark helmet. Who’s underneath that evil exterior, anyway? Why, it’s a kindly old, worm-bitten English gent (Sebastian Shaw). Oh, gee, how nice! Just before the big reveal, as Vader drops the emperor into that nuclear frying pan (how the heck did he lift the fiend with only one usable limb?), a brief glimpse of a skeletal skull is flashed across his lordship’s dark visage. Whew! Talk about evil escaping!  

Of course, the Death Star II will be eliminated. And of course, the explosion will be mammoth sized in proportion to its surroundings, but patently anticlimactic. Down goes the Imperial trawler. Up comes Master Luke as he tries to rescue dad from the flaming wreck, but dad can’t make it. So, the kindly old British gent expires, breathing his last with what looks like Bob Dylan or Neil Young’s harmonica strapped to his kisser. Good, Lord! Didn’t anyone see the connection? I sure did. Another one bites the dust, making room for the new and improved. Time to play a happy tune, for once! Hit it, Darth!!!

Lord Vader (Sebastian Shaw) breathes his last in ‘Return of the Jedi’ (1983)

That final, massive Death Star II explosion unleashes a spontaneous celebration on Endor. Ah, but there’s one last plot point to be resolved: Han learns that Leia is related to Luke by birth. And, boy, is he clueless about it to the end. Man, what a sap! And a clear disappointment to Solo’s millions of fans: a slam-bang, much-admired hero turned into a simpleton with a whimper and a kiss. Speaking of which, Little Wicket emerges from the underbrush, spreading good cheer about their victory against the Empire.

The final wrap-up of events includes Luke’s burning of his dad’s remains. How he managed to heave Vader’s hefty carcass up the gangplank and into his fighter craft is anybody’s guess. (Hint: He used the Force.) This is followed by an extended glimpse into other planetary celebrations extolling the rebels’ victory. Whoopee!

My biggest and loudest complaint was, is, and will forever remain the replacement of that wonderful little Ewok song and dance number (so apropos in this context) with a totally unsatisfactory, minor, minor, and I do mean minor musical interlude. Hey, where’s the chorus? After they made their first “appearance” in the duel to end all duels, Lucas decided to drop them? Fans won’t hear another vocal display of this magnitude until Episode I: The Phantom Menace, in the climactic “Duel of the Fates” sequence. In the interim, shame on you, John Williams, for giving in to this charade! This must have been Lucas’ biggest faux pas; one I’ve learned to revile and despise from the minute I heard it.

The other egregious example of gratuitous, self-congratulatory exploitation is Lucas’ replacement of reliable old Sebastian Shaw, as Jedi Knight Anakin Skywalker, with (get ready for it….) the figure of young Hayden Christensen as an allegedly adult, whiny-voiced Anakin, in long-flowing priestly Jedi robes no less. AAARRGHH!!! Spare me from washed up producer-directors, please!!!

Before (below) and after (above): Two different endings for ‘Star Wars: Episode VI — Return of the Jedi’

Beginning of the End, or End of the Beginning?

Throughout their struggles, the Star Wars characters have indeed changed. They have undergone immense transformations in how they think and how they act. They’ve evolved into areas one could never have possibly envisioned: from the series’ humble beginnings in 1977 to their blockbuster 1983 ending. This, then, is what has made Star Wars so beloved by fans.

The three earlier films can be looked at by each succeeding generation as a continuously evolving epic saga on the grandest of scales — a modern myth for Baby Boomers, millennials, Generation-Xers, -Yers, -Zers, and whichever part of the alphabet comes next; both nerds and geeks everywhere, and from sci-fi freaks, computer whizzes, and wimpy kids, to anything and everything in between.

We’ve all grown up, we’ve all grown old, matured, or become more infantile (if you prefer) with age. Similarly, the series has encompassed all phases of our lives. Indeed, for nearly two generations the Star Wars series has been such an integral part of our youth, and our movie-going experience, that as time passes it gets harder and harder to let go. Before our eyes, and in three back-to-back episodes, the struggles of the main protagonists — and numerous side characters — have meant many things to many people.

We see the father we never knew. We meet the sister we’ve come to love. We’ve made close contacts, lifelong companions, and hardened foes: the bonds that never break, and the ones that should have broken. We’ve welcomed furry little bear-like creatures into our homes, along with eight-foot-tall walking carpets. Other fantastic creations, such as robots, droids, rocket ships galore, blasters, and galaxies so far, far away; daring escapades, split-second space travel, incredible floating cities in the sky; the villains you love to hate, the characters you hate to lose — an infinite technological and emotional universe where wonders never cease to amaze.

The ‘Star Wars’ cast of universally beloved characters from 1977 to 1983

America, too, has changed. The country has evolved from the pure innocence of postwar prosperity to middle-aged anxiety, holding on to an ever-more unattainable cultural dominance and influence. On the debit side, we’ve become incapable of resolving the complex issues that were once so easily within our grasp. Indeed, the country has advanced into another sphere entirely, certainly apart from the vaunted vision the movies had formerly inspired.

In a scant thirty years, our military forces have, indeed, become powerful, as our leaders have foreseen. They are the envy of the planet; while our prestige and honor, at home and abroad, as the symbol of truth, justice, liberty, and fair play, have begun to erode. Only the old saying that “might makes right” appears to have been retained. Can we prevent, or at the least circumvent, our own downfall? Can the ultimate fate of our nation be stemmed by a reversal in policy, or will we be brought to our knees, as the errant Darth Vader was, by the pure faith, innocence, and belief of a young Luke Skywalker, before it is too late?

George Lucas and his film empire have evolved as well and grown to Babylonian proportions. His Lucasfilms, ILM (Industrial Light and Magic), THX certification (after Tomlinson Holman, a colleague of Lucas), and CGI-equipped workshops have labored over a number of projects: from Jurassic Park and Robocop to Titanic and well beyond. His special FX wizards Paul Tippett, Dennis Murren, Stan Winston, Jim Henson’s creature workshop, Frank Oz, and all the puppeteers and purveyors of movie magic, have outpaced the actual work done by Old Georgie, who’s always considered himself more of a visionary producer and merchandiser than a director. I’m inclined to agree.

The special FX created for the original Star Wars films, while big, bombastic, and superior to anything from the 1930s or ‘40s before it, were detailed and finely rendered; there was a tactile beauty, a brilliance and a sheen to the scale models of impressive battle cruisers and intergalactic freighters. Part of the beauty of the Millennium Falcon and other sturdy spacecraft was that they had a solidity to them, that “used and lived in” look so endearing to us fans.

But as the original Star Wars epics have concluded their second and third series of stories, the more technologically advanced digital realm of the cinema has superseded the model-based Millennium Falcon of old. The charm, daring, and over-arching idealism of a brash, cheeky techno-geek named George Lucas have given way to the stale, standard, and joyless digital exercises of today, those utterly devoid of character and appeal.

Lucas’ “revivification” of the Star Wars series, with Episode I: The Phantom Menace, Episode II: Attack of the Clones, and Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, were box office hits, no doubt of that; but they were also emotionally barren, dramatically inert, and technically nullified duds, barely registering on the human scale, but gigantic on the technological meter and desktop front.

Similar to the pleas above, can the series itself survive its long-prophesied demise? The latter entries were promising at best, but ultimately failed to recapture the spirit of the originals. Can we stem the ultimate tide? And can we bring it to its knees, as previously described, in the way Darth Vader was forced to do by the strength and power of the Force and its followers — those purveyors of the pure faith, the keepers of the Jedi flame — with the same innocence, naïveté, and belief that an optimistic, incorruptible Luke Skywalker had experienced, before it is too late?

We cannot provide the answers, only more questions. However, let me leave readers with this final word, a message from the great beyond, received directly from the source: May the Force be with us … always! Φ

Copyright © 2022 by Josmar F. Lopes

Of Princes and Potentates — The Met Opera Presents Borodin’s ‘Prince Igor’ and Verdi’s ‘Don Carlos’ (Part Two): It’s French to Me

Verdi’s French five-act, version of ‘Don Carlos’ at the Met Opera (Photo: Met Opera)

Boxed-In at the Opera

Verdi’s five-act opus maximus Don Carlos from 1867 is the veteran composer’s longest stage-work by far. It was written and conceived for the Paris Opéra in French and, according to the May 2022 issue of Opera News and other books, pamphlets, and journals, was revised, edited, and presented in the French language. Point taken, point made!

That being the case, this writer has always preferred the more familiar Italian version, one that Met Opera patrons, and U.S. audiences in general, have been hearing since the 1950s and beyond. Various attempts at reintroducing this massive work in its elaborate French-style musical setting have been met with the usual fanfare, touting its literary superiority over the standard Italian translation, and so forth. Yet, despite this ongoing effort, most opera companies continue to stress the Italianate version above all others.

Okay, I get it. I’m all for authenticity where original works are concerned. As an example, I’ve spent countless hours and reams of online pages in support of going back to a composer’s initial ideas about a subject. The better to elicit a clearer understanding of their work has been a practice of mine for as long as I can remember. I don’t know if I’ve succeeded, but that’s been my intention all along.

However, in the case of Don Carlos — also known as Don Carlo but without the “s” — and unlike my review of the Met’s Dmitri Tcherniakov production of Borodin’s Prince Igor (see the following link: https://josmarlopes.wordpress.com/2022/04/15/of-princes-and-potentates-the-met-opera-presents-borodins-prince-igor-and-verdis-don-carlos-part-one/), it all depends on a production team’s ultimate goals vis-à-vis the final outcome.

With this new production, David McVicar’s immobile direction and Charles Edwards’ impractical set designs (two massive column-like structures taking up both sides of the stage) and staircase to heaven-knows-where playing area severely limit the singers’ mobility. What these two towers do, in effect, is present an utterly static stage picture by making each scene resemble the other, with scarcely any variation in between. And for a work that lasts a good five-and-a-half hours — we’re talking Die Meistersinger lengths here — boredom and impatience quickly set in.

Not only that, but the lack of a true Latinate spark (let alone of the Gallic variety) was absent in an otherwise smart-looking cast, courtesy of costume designer Brigitte Reiffenstuel. Talk about your basic color scheme, this production gave new meaning to the phrase, “Paint it black.”

Carlos (Matthew Polenzani) and Rodrigue (Etienne Dupuis) swear loyalty

Another point to quibble over was the head-scratching plan to return this production to next season’s lineup, but reverting to the out-of-style, four-act version of Don Carlo — and in the Italian language of all things! How’s that for inconsistency? We’re at a loss to understand this retro-line of thinking. Why go to all the trouble and expense in coaching the cast in French vernacular and singing style? Why have them re-learn their roles en français, then go back to the past and unlearn everything that had been taught in the first place? Is this what they call circular logic? What are we missing here?

We’re just as puzzled as readers are with this warped reasoning. Or did the Met management think at all about what it was proposing? We have no clue. If McVicar’s production was worth the extra effort put into it — what’s been termed as “authenticity” — I’d be more than willing to stay the course. Wouldn’t you? But no! As they say, the past is prologue. And McVicar’s prior undertaking of Donizetti’s Tudor Trilogy (i.e., Anna Bolena, Maria Stuarda, Roberto Devereux) proved just that: this trio of works were as infuriatingly dull and opaque as this new Don Carlos, despite excellent singing all-around. Interestingly, the music that Verdi initially composed for this French version bore the unmistakable trademarks of the Donizettian style.

The Act IV quartet: Rodrigue (Dupuis), Elisabeth (Yoncheva), Eboli (Barton) and Philippe (Owens)

The proof in this Met Opera pudding, though, was that Don Carlos, in any language, is an incredibly enduring masterpiece; surely Verdi’s finest effort at out-doing Giacomo Meyerbeer’s grandest of grand operas, Les Huguenots, in scope and grandiosity, something that much-maligned composer had once cornered the market on.

One last point: If the Met’s advertisement of “completeness” is to be believed, then where was the opening chorus of downtrodden working folk, unearthed for John Dexter’s revised 1979 production (one that I was personally privy to, in fact)? Unless my research deceives me, this chorus comprises a key plot element, in that the young and impressionable Élisabeth de Valois (or Elisabetta in Italian) chooses to sacrifice her future happiness with the Infante, Don Carlos, for a marriage of convenience to his father, the Spanish King Philip II.

History, that merciless conveyor of undesirable truths, tells us the real Élisabeth was all of thirteen at the time of her engagement. Don Carlos, her intended, was a mentally unstable twelve-year-old, while the “elderly” Philip was in the prime of his early-thirties life. So much for historical accuracy! In theatrical terms, it’s known as artistic license. Whatever!

By that token, where was the music for La Peregrina, the lavish ballet that Verdi conceived for the opera’s Third Act? It’s a wonderfully melodic piece, so rich and harmonious, surely one of the Italian master’s most satisfying attempts at this type of fare. It tells a semi-related story of the magnificent gemstone by the same name, worn by the tempestuous Princess Eboli, an actual historical personage.

The gem, an enormous pearl, was once owned by another real-life Elisabeth, the British-born actress Elizabeth (with a “z”) Taylor — a gift from her on-again, off-again lover and hubby, Welsh actor Richard Burton. That’s a story in itself, and worthy of operatic treatment all its own!

The ‘Don’ is Out

Meyerbeer’s ‘Les Huguenots,’ revived at Opera Bastille in Paris in 2018

I was serious when mentioning Meyerbeer and his massive Les Huguenots. The similarities in plot, structure, characterizations, and such — five acts, seven principal singers, the religious conflict between French Protestants (called Huguenots) and Roman Catholics, the palace intrigues, and the historical St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre of 1572 — all combine in a sumptuous vocal and scenic display bar none. No doubt Meyerbeer’s extravagant designs, infrequently performed today but revived on occasion, went on to heavily influence the likes of Verdi, Berlioz, Wagner, and others.  

With all that in mind, I’m still uncertain that Don Carlos’ central figures, i.e., the emotionally unstable Don (tenor), his fiancée-turned-stepmother Queen Élisabeth de Valois (soprano), her lady-in-waiting Princess Eboli (mezzo-soprano), the page Thibault (Tebaldo, coloratura), Rodrigue the Marquis de Posa (Rodrigo, baritone), Le Roi Philippe II (King Philip II or Filippo, bass), Le Grand Inquisiteur (The Grand Inquisitor, bass), and the mysterious Moine (or Monk, bass), can be compared directly to their counterparts in Les Huguenots.

In point of fact, they do come close: the Huguenot nobleman and firebrand Raoul de Nangis (tenor), his love interest Valentine de Saint-Bris (soprano), the haughty Queen Marguerite de Valois (soprano), Urbain the queen’s page (mezzo), the Count de Nevers (baritone), the Count de Saint-Bris and paterfamilias to Valentine (bass-baritone), and the fanatical Huguenot soldier/servant Marcel (bass). All have corresponding relationships to Verdi’s protagonists. In particular, the historical Élisabeth and Marguerite were both sisters as well as daughters to King Henri II of France. Their mother happened to be the infamous Catherine de Medici. How’s that for an extended family?

While the source for Les Huguenots lay with the prolific French dramatist Eugène Scribe (who also provided the libretto for Verdi’s other French-language effort, Les Vêpres siciliennes), the text for Don Carlos, the work of Joseph Méry and Camille Du Locle (whom we’ll meet again as the force behind Verdi’s Aida), was based primarily on German playwright Friedrich Schiller’s dramatic poem Don Carlos, Infant von Spanien (“The Spanish Heir”). Neither opera nor source materials were historically accurate, not by any stretch.  

Where the two works differed was in the way that Meyerbeer shaped the individual vocal lines. In Les Huguenots, the singers were given extended cadenzas wherein whole phrases were repeated endlessly and seemingly at will. Artists were encouraged to interpolate as much as possible, which tended to blunt the dramatic aspects of the story. With Verdi, however, drama took precedence over embellishment, resulting in a more cohesive work overall, built mostly upon character development and through standard set pieces (solos, duets, trios, quartets, ensembles, and such). 

To summarize, there’s a lot going on here, and a lot to mull over. So, what was the final outcome? Judging from the March 26, 2022 Saturday matinee broadcast there was also a lot to be desired. Presided over by the Met’s music director Yannick Nézet-Séguin, who last conducted the work back in 2015 (in Nicholas Hytner’s stylized production), with Donald Palumbo in charge of the chorus, the Met Opera Orchestra achieved a high level of response. The strings soared and the trombones blared, with everything in between sounding perfectly timed and executed. So far, so good.

Still, the ultimate “oomph” factor, that spark of inspiration that can ignite the artistic flames on stage, went missing from this performance. I couldn’t put my finger on it, but the problem might have had to do with the continuing COVID-19 restrictions. That is, mask-wearing, physical distancing, vaccine and/or booster requirements, whatever. Hmm, well maybe. Who knows? I’m not sure what the issue was, but the usual boisterous reaction to Verdi’s surefire score was muted, to say the least.  

Casting Calls: They’re Up, They’re Down

Don Carlos (Matthew Polenzani), Princess Eboli (Jamie Barton), and Rodrigue (Etienne Dupuis)

Perhaps the artists themselves had something to do with it. Or the fact that unfamiliarity with the French style and language may have prevented this performance from fully taking off. Let’s see…

To start, tenor Matthew Polenzani as the youthful Don has been dipping his foot into the French repertoire for several seasons. He made a perfectly suitable Nadir in the company’s Les Pêcheurs de Perles (The Pearl Fishers). And his assumption of such high-lying roles as Hoffmann in Les Contes d’Hoffmann, Werther in Jules Massenet’s eponymously titled opera, and Roméo in Gounod’s Roméo et Juliette have very much pleased his public, along with this author. Polenzani’s got the right touch, and enough musicianship in his bones to pull this assignment off. No problem there.

He’s put on a bit of weight since the pandemic began, but vocally that extra heft has added to his ability to husband his resources, and to float those top notes into the vast Met auditorium. What did not help was that ever-present staircase, curiously similar to one that Josef Svoboda designed for John Dexter’s drab 1974 staging of Verdi’s I Vespri Siciliani (in its Italian configuration). I should know since I was present in the audience for the 1982 revival.

As Élisabeth, Bulgarian soprano Sonya Yoncheva floated her exquisite pianissimos to startling effect. At full throttle, Yoncheva proved a sensation. Earlier this season, she delivered the goods as a dynamic and sexy as hell Tosca, aided by tenor Brian Jagde (pronounced “Jade”), stentorian in his delivery but lacking the sensitivity required for the painter Cavaradossi. In Don Carlos, Yoncheva, too, became hampered by that awkward staircase. One wanted to shout at both her and Polenzani to stay put, people!

Queen Elisabeth (Sonya Yoncheva) cares for the epileptic Don Carlos (Polenzani)

Fine passage work, and vocal fireworks galore, were supplied in abundance, courtesy of mezzo-soprano Jamie Barton (a substitute for the previously announced Elīna Garanča), who threw off her eyepatch in Act Four to reveal Eboli’s missing eyeball, a nice touch many directors overlook. Barton stopped the show with “O don fatal,” hurled full throttle into the highest reaches. But she, too, was a frequent victim of the sets swallowing up her sound.

In her intermission interview with soprano Ailyn Perez, Barton mentioned the late, great Tatiana Troyanos, who similarly ripped off that eyepatch to terrific effect in the 1980 PBS broadcast of Don Carlo, as the inspiration for this dramatic gesture. Imitation, in this instance, was surely the sincerest form of flattery.

Princess Eboli (Jamie Barton) sans her trademark eyepatch

With his impressive physique du rôle, French-Canadian baritone Étienne Dupuis won the Legion d’Honneur award for his masculine portrayal of the virile Don Rodrigue. Such elegance and verbal panache have not been heard at the Met, nor in this part, for quite some time. Certainly not since the late Dmitri Hvorostovsky graced the stage. Dupuis was as near to perfection as anyone in this part. His was the lone authentically French-sounding portrayal among the cast members. Likewise, his Mohawk hairdo, shaved sideburns, and full-length beard may have had a hand in winning the crowd’s favor. Touché and away!

Our biggest disappointment, moreover, was with bass-baritone Eric Owens as a dull, placid, and seemingly out of sorts Roi Philippe. Can you say underpowered? What gives with Owens these days, anyway? Where was that massive outpouring Met audiences have come to expect, and be spoiled by; that darkly shaded timbre that made his Alberich and Hagen in Wagner’s Ring cycle so frighteningly potent? Ever since his listless delivery of Porgy’s lines in The Gershwin’s Porgy and Bess production two seasons ago (due to a debilitating head cold), Owens has been, well, holding back. We pray he can overcome this vocal crisis, for indeed he’s in a crisis of sorts.    

King Philippe (Eric Owens) rails at the Grand Inquisitor (John Relyea) in Act IV of ‘Don Carlos’

Case in point: Owens’ “Elle ne m’aime pas,” the Francophile version of the bass aria, “Ella giammai m’amo” (“She never loved me”), went by the boards. Again, his clenched-teeth style of vocalizing can grate on one’s nerves, so often that he employs this technique to inconsistent levels. Open it up there, Eric! And let it ring! Audiences want to hear you shout — over and out. To be fair-minded in these surroundings, Owens was another last-minute replacement, this time for German basso Günther Groissböck.

His opposite number, Canadian bass-baritone John Relyea, portrayed the Grand Inquisiteur with relish and single-minded purpose. Perhaps a role reversal was called for? Just saying. To be honest, Relyea has been electrifying Met audiences for years. I can recall his villainous Gessler in Rossini’s Guillaume Tell, along with his entertainingly sly Méphistophélès in Robert Lepage’s multimedia incarnation of Berlioz’s La Damnation de Faust. Oh, and let’s factor in his unctuous interpretation of Don Basilio in that riotous Il Barbiere di Siviglia from a few years back. He’ll be making another “appearance” this season as the Ghost of Hamlet’s father in Australian composer Brett Dean’s startlingly modernistic take on Shakespeare’s Hamlet.

As the page Thibault, Meigui Zhang warbled her lines pleasantly. This was one of Verdi’s few ventures into travesty parts, whereby a female singer portrays a dashing young man (in the mode of Oscar in Un Ballo in Maschera, or Cherubino in Mozart’s The Marriage of Figaro). The black-robed Monk’s sepulchral bellowing (in reality, he’s Holy Roman Emperor Charles V in disguise — don’t ask!) were intoned by British basso Matthew Rose.

We certainly were more than delighted to have Don Carlos back, especially in its original conception. Well, as “original” as audiences are likely to get. But seeing snippets of Hytner’s earlier production on You Tube, the one this McVicar version replaced, headed by Roberto Alagna (ideally cast), Marina Poplavskaya, Simon Keenlyside, Anna Smirnova, Ferruccio Furlanetto, and James Morris, made one ponder the imponderable: Why, oh, why couldn’t the Met leave well enough alone and make better use of an existing production?

That is a shame. Verdi’s longest, most fascinating creation holds many lessons for our times. The struggle between public duty and private turmoil; the fight for what’s right; the freedom to think and shape one’s own destiny.

The most obvious — and, certainly, the most telling — lies in its depiction of a religious state that exploits and oppresses those who hold a contrary belief system. “Donnez la liberté,” shouts Rodrigue near the conclusion of Act II, in his bold speech to Le Roi Philippe. “Give them liberty!” The King muses on this strange dreamer. What can he be thinking? Liberty, you say? Why, no problem at all. The King has given peace to the known world. To that logic, Rodrigue has a disgusted response: “La paix du cimetière!” – “The peace of the grave!”   

Point taken, point made.

Copyright © 2022 by Josmar F. Lopes